Preview Issue #8: Mylan’s Generic EpiPen, Rite Aid Divesture and Allergan Acquisition

INO Health & Biotech Stock Guide

Preview Issue #8 - January 11, 2017

BIOTECH, HEALTH & PHARMA NEWS

Healthcare related stocks and more notably the biotech cohort saw a very tumultuous 2016. As the political backdrop, drug pricing debate and presidential election were thrusted into the spotlight, healthcare related stocks responded erratically to any news that would have a perceived impact on the industry. Now that 2016 it’s in the books, investors can look to 2017 and the new administration under president-elect Donald Trump. Since Donald Trump voiced his concerns over drug pricing, the initial rally in healthcare-related stocks has largely eroded to pre-election levels. Initially, the entire cohort saw significant gains as traders viewed a republican controlled government in positive light with regard to the healthcare sector. Considering the aforementioned factors throughout 2016, the iShares NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (Ticker:IBB) traded in a wide range with pronounced volatility after the presidential election posting a range of ~$240 to $344 or a 104-point gap. The upcoming 2017 year is shaping up to be an eventful one with continued uncertainty with regard to the political climate, governmental stance on mergers and acquisitions, potential deregulation, potential restructuring of the Affordable Care Act and a potentially more favorable tax and repatriation rates throughout the industry.

Continue reading "Preview Issue #8: Mylan’s Generic EpiPen, Rite Aid Divesture and Allergan Acquisition"

IBB Looks Ripe For A Turnaround In 2017

Noah Kiedrowski - INO.com Contributor - Biotech


Introduction

Will the confluence of abating political uncertainty, proposed self-regulation on drug price increases, potential merger and acquisition activity and chronically depressed valuations bode well for IBB in 2017? The biotech cohort saw a very tumultuous 2016 to say the least as the political backdrop, drug pricing debate and presidential election took the headlines. Biotech stocks responded erratically to any news that would have a perceived impact on the cohort during this timeframe. Since Donald Trump voiced his concerns over drug pricing, the initial rally in biotech has largely eroded to pre-election levels. The iShares Biotechnology Index ETF (NASDAQ:IBB) traded in a wide range throughout 2016 with pronounced volatility throughout the presidential election cycle registering a range of ~$240 to $344 or a 104-point range (Figure 1). The upcoming 2017 year is shaping up to be an eventful one with continued uncertainty about the political climate, governmental stance on mergers and acquisitions and potential deregulation. Another hot button issue will be the potential restructuring of the Affordable Care Act and proposed favorable tax and repatriation rates. Continue reading "IBB Looks Ripe For A Turnaround In 2017"

Is McKesson Investable Again?

Noah Kiedrowski - INO.com Contributor - Biotech


Introduction

Is McKesson Corporation (NYSE:MCK) investable again now that the fallout over its missed Q2 2017 numbers has been absorbed and the negative sentiment priced into the stock. Although this was the fourth consecutive quarter in which McKesson has missed revenue targets, McKesson has sold off by ~$100 per share or 42% from its all-time highs in May of 2015 falling from $240 to roughly $140 as of recent trading (Figure 1). In February I wrote a piece on McKesson stating that I felt McKesson presented a buying opportunity when the stock sank to a 52-week low of $148 per share. As that call began to come to fruition, I wrote a series of follow-up articles voicing caution as the share price appreciated. As shares appreciated ~30% by reaching the ~$200 level in the summer, I was hesitant due to pressures regarding the pharmaceutical supply chain and earnings from other pharmaceutical wholesalers such as Cardinal Health. At that time, I had relinquished my position in McKesson due to the run-up in share price and the growing concerns of the business model in combination with social and political pressures. As these pressures mounted the stock witnessed another double-digit fall from the ~$200 level to ~$125 during the back half of 2016. Now that the stock has stabilized at the $140 level, boasts a reasonable P/E ratio, more certainty surrounding the political backdrop and acquisitions coming full circle, McKesson may be an investable stock once again. Continue reading "Is McKesson Investable Again?"

Preview Issue #7: Trump Issues Warning To Pharma, Drug Pricing Debate Continues and the 21st Century Cures Bill

INO Health & Biotech Stock Guide

Preview Issue #7 - December 29, 2016

BIOTECH, HEALTH & PHARMA NEWS

President-elect Donald Trump has thrown cold water on the recently volatile healthcare cohort as he voiced concerns on rising drug prices. The Trump rally continues to power on as the S&P 500, Nasdaq and Dow Jones continue to break all-time highs on what seems like a daily occurrence. Since Trump voiced his concerns over drug pricing the rally has largely left healthcare related stocks (pharmaceutical companies, pharmacies and wholesalers) behind the overall rise in the broader markets as of recent. The entire cohort has seen significant gains as traders viewed a republican controlled government in positive light with regard to this sector. However after recent comments from Donald Trump regarding the drug pricing debate much of these gains have been relegated to the pre-Trump rally levels. This optimistic perspective has faded after Donald Trump stated “I’m going to bring down drug prices” and “I don’t like what has happened with drug prices”. The iShares NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (Ticker: IBB) has been on a rollercoaster since the day just prior to the presidential election posting a broad range of movement from ~$247 to $293 or a 46-point swing (19% move). Investors were factoring-in a healthcare-friendly government in terms of scrutiny on the merger and acquisition front, deregulation, potential restructuring of the Affordable Care Act and a move favorable tax and repatriation rates throughout the industry. This sentiment has taken a breather to the time being.

WHAT'S NEXT

Recently, the federal government passed a major piece of legislation that bodes well for the industry. This legislative passage of the 21st Century Cures bill is a preverbal commitment by the government that they stand behind the efforts of industry and government in curing and treating diseases. The 21st Century Cures bill cleared the House and Senate and is aimed at easing FDA drug and device approvals and includes funds for NIH, cancer moonshot and a precision medicine initiative. This bill should provide an industry-friendly regulatory backdrop for drug and medical device companies moving into the near future. This bill provides $6.3 billion that supporters say will spur medical innovation, speed access to new drugs, expand access to mental health treatment and battle the opioid epidemic in America. The bill had widespread bipartisan support, including the backing of the Obama administration. Critics of the bill contend that it provides huge handouts to the biotech and pharmaceutical industries. Taken together, this bill in concert with a perceived pro-industry government coming to fruition should provide a tailwind for companies in this space.

INDUSTRY OUTLOOK

The drug pricing debate is clearing not going away anytime soon and will likely persist into the new administration. Donald Trump has made that clear during his interview with Time Magazine for his Person of the Year award. Pharmaceutical executives seem to have taken note of this and are attempting to get out in front of the issue. Brent Saunders (CEO of Allergan) has lead the charge in this movement. He vowed to limit drug price increases to single-digit percentages once a year. This seems to be working to some extent with Novo Nordisk falling in-line with a similar commitment. “We hear from more and more people living with diabetes about the challenges they face affording healthcare, including the medicines we make,” Jakob Riis, Novo Nordisk's U.S. president. “This has become a responsibility that needs to be shared among all those involved in healthcare and we’re going to do our part.” If drug companies self-regulate and get this drug pricing issue behind them along with the absence of political uncertainty may continue to provide a much needed lift to the sector.

FEATURED STOCK / ETF - Rite Aid (RAD)

Rite Aid - RAD

ABOUT THE EDITOR - Noah Kiedrowski

I am biotechnology professional with a diverse scientific background and detailed knowledge in many therapeutic areas such as monoclonal antibodies, immunotherapies and antivirals. I have a personal interest in finance, investing, trading and global markets. My analysis is focused on stocks and exchange traded funds (ETFs) while exploring niche opportunities such as derivative trading via options. This newsletter is intended to provide investors with the latest developments and trends regarding the overall healthcare sector with a biotechnology emphasis. I'll be highlighting sector trends, merger and acquisition activity, noteworthy current events, political developments and drug approvals. My focus will be centered on well-established mid-cap and large-cap companies as well as utilizing appropriate ETFs as proxies for sector trends. This is a bi-monthly newsletter service that reflects my own opinions and analyses. This newsletter is not intended to be a recommendation to buy or sell any stock or ETF mentioned. I am not a professional financial advisor or tax professional, rather an individual investor who analyzes investment strategies and disseminates my analyses. I encourage all investors to conduct their own research and due diligence prior to investing.

---

This bi-monthly newsletter service reflects the opinions and analyses of INO Contributor, Noah Kiedrowski. This newsletter is not intended to be a recommendation to buy or sell any stock or ETF mentioned. Kiedrowski is not a professional financial advisor or tax professional, rather an individual investor who analyzes investment strategies and disseminates his own analyses. All traders and investors should conduct their own research and due diligence prior to investing.

CVS - Overreaction or Justified Selloff?

Noah Kiedrowski - INO.com Contributor - Biotech


Introduction

CVS Health (NYSE:CVS) recently reported what was ostensibly another great quarter reporting a year-over-year increase of 28% and 16% in EPS and revenue, respectively. After reporting its Q3 earnings, CVS sold off 17%, moving down from $84 to $70 at market open. I’ve written several articles putting forth the case that CVS presents a compelling investment opportunity in the growing healthcare space. My investment thesis was based on the fact that CVS has been highly acquisitive, continues to deliver robust earnings growth, revenue growth, growing dividends and has an aggressive share buyback program in place. With its recent acquisitions of Target’s pharmacies and Omnicare, these proactive measures will significantly expand its presence and ability to dispense prescriptions to the general public and in long-term care facilities. As healthcare costs and prescription drug costs continue to rise and the population continues to age with the elderly comprising a larger segment of the overall population, CVS looked poised to benefit. Recent marketplace trends have forced CVS to cut guidance for Q4 2016 and the full-year 2017 numbers. Given this dichotomy between the company’s historically strong fundamentals and share price, was this an overreaction or was the selloff justified? Continue reading "CVS - Overreaction or Justified Selloff?"